There is an old joke about lesbian dating. What does a lesbian bring to a second date? A U-Haul (Moving-truck). The punchline has been circulating for decades, and although it has inspired countless memes, dating stories and knowing smiles, it raises an interesting question. Why have relationships between women developed such a reputation for moving at extraordinary speed?
The stereotype is familiar even to people who have never dated another woman. Two women meet, spend an entire weekend together, start leaving clothes at each other’s homes and, before anyone has quite worked out what happened, they’re discussing furniture, pets and whose apartment has the better kitchen.
It’s an entertaining image, but is there actually something different about the way women fall in love with women, or has an old joke become so familiar that people have stopped questioning it?
Where did the U-Haul joke come from?
The joke is commonly attributed to American comedian Lea DeLaria, who was performing stand-up long before becoming widely known for playing Big Boo in Orange Is the New Black. It became particularly popular within lesbian communities during the late twentieth century, when queer humour offered a way of laughing at experiences that mainstream culture rarely acknowledged.
A U-Haul, for anyone unfamiliar with the reference, is an American moving-truck rental company. The implication is that lesbians are so eager to commit that a second date might as well involve moving house.
The joke works because it exaggerates something recognisable: the excitement of meeting someone who seems to understand you, followed by the temptation to spend every possible moment together. But it also reflects a particular period in lesbian social history, when meeting compatible partners could be considerably more difficult than it is today.
Before dating applications and widespread LGBTQ+ visibility, women often relied on bars, friendship networks and relatively small social circles to meet potential partners. In some places, finding another woman who was both openly attracted to women and available for a relationship was no small achievement.
When that connection happened, there could be a strong incentive to hold on to it. Geography, secrecy and limited opportunities sometimes made relationships feel more urgent than they might otherwise have been.
That doesn’t mean lesbians were universally moving in together after two dates. It means the stereotype emerged from a social environment in which romantic opportunities could be precious, and where humour helped make sense of the intensity surrounding them.
When a first date turns into an entire weekend
One of the pleasures of a promising new relationship is discovering how much there is to talk about. A dinner becomes drinks, drinks become a late-night walk, and suddenly it’s three in the morning and neither person seems particularly interested in going home.
For some women dating women, that sense of connection can be especially powerful. Shared experiences of growing up queer, navigating family expectations or discovering sexuality later in life can create an immediate feeling of familiarity.
Two people who have only just met might find themselves discussing subjects they have never comfortably explored with previous partners. The conversation can feel unusually personal, not necessarily because they know each other particularly well, but because certain experiences require less explanation.
Of course, heterosexual couples can experience exactly the same thing. Falling in love has never been an especially rational process, and the early stages of attraction frequently involve an impressive disregard for sleep, responsibilities and unanswered emails.
The difference may be less about sexuality itself and more about the circumstances in which people meet. When someone has spent years feeling misunderstood, finding a person who appears to recognise that part of their life can be intoxicating.
And when the connection feels that good, waiting until next Friday for another date can seem unnecessarily complicated.
Is emotional intimacy the same as compatibility?
Women are often encouraged to communicate openly about their feelings, relationships and personal experiences. Although these expectations vary enormously between individuals and cultures, they can influence the way romantic relationships develop.
When two people are comfortable discussing emotions, intimacy can grow quickly. They might talk about previous relationships, family difficulties, ambitions and insecurities within the first few weeks of dating.
That openness can be wonderful. It can also create the impression that a relationship is further along than it actually is.
Knowing someone’s childhood fears, favourite memories and complicated relationship with her mother doesn’t necessarily tell you how she behaves when she’s angry, whether she’s financially responsible or how she handles disagreements about everyday life.
Those discoveries tend to require time.
A couple might feel extraordinarily close after three weeks and still know very little about how they function together under pressure. They may agree about politics, music and the importance of good communication, only to discover that one considers arriving twenty minutes late perfectly acceptable while the other finds it unforgivable.
Emotional intimacy is an important part of compatibility, but it isn’t a substitute for discovering whether two lives actually fit together.
The small dating pool problem
Another possible explanation for the U-Haul stereotype has less to do with romance and more to do with practical circumstances.
For lesbians and bisexual women living outside major cities, the dating pool can be limited. Finding someone attractive, emotionally available, geographically accessible and interested in a similar kind of relationship can require patience.
Dating applications have made it easier to connect with other women, but they haven’t eliminated the problem of distance. A promising match might live in another city, another region or even another country.
Long-distance relationships can develop their own accelerated rhythm. When seeing each other requires travel and planning, couples may spend several consecutive days together rather than meeting casually for an hour after work.
Those visits can resemble miniature versions of living together. There are shared meals, mornings in bed, shopping trips and the inevitable discovery of each other’s domestic habits.
After several months of travelling backwards and forwards, moving in together might seem like a practical solution rather than an impulsive romantic gesture.
It may also be financially convenient, particularly when maintaining two homes and paying for regular travel becomes expensive.
Not every rapid move is motivated by overwhelming passion. Sometimes it’s simply easier to share a kitchen.
When the honeymoon phase takes over
The beginning of a relationship can make even sensible people behave in ways they would normally find ridiculous.
There’s the constant messaging, the inability to concentrate at work and the sudden conviction that someone you’ve known for eighteen days is unlike anyone you’ve ever met.
Psychologists sometimes use the term limerence to describe an intense state of romantic infatuation, often involving intrusive thoughts, idealisation and a strong desire for reciprocation.
It isn’t exclusive to lesbians, or even to romantic relationships between women. But it offers a useful way of understanding why some couples become deeply invested in each other before they’ve had much opportunity to assess the relationship realistically.
During this period, differences can seem charming rather than frustrating. A partner’s disorganisation feels spontaneous. Her stubbornness looks like confidence. Her habit of calling six times a day is interpreted as devotion.
Several months later, those same behaviours may look rather different.
The difficulty isn’t falling in love quickly. Some relationships develop rapidly and remain happy for decades. The challenge is distinguishing genuine compatibility from the excitement of discovering someone new.
Making major decisions during that initial rush can be risky, especially when they involve shared finances, housing or responsibilities that aren’t easily reversed.
The other side of moving too quickly
For every couple with a charming story about moving in together after a month, there’s another that discovered the relationship wasn’t quite what they imagined.
Living together reveals details that dating can conveniently conceal. How someone manages money, responds to stress, divides household responsibilities and respects personal space becomes much more difficult to ignore when both people share the same address.
Moving quickly can also make it harder to recognise unhealthy relationship patterns.
Someone who demands constant attention might initially appear deeply romantic. A partner who wants to spend every evening together may seem wonderfully committed, until maintaining friendships or spending time alone begins to create conflict.
Intensity isn’t automatically a warning sign, but neither is it proof of love.
Healthy relationships need room for individual lives, boundaries and the possibility of disagreement. That remains true whether a couple has been together for three weeks or ten years.
There’s also the practical complication of separating after moving in together. Ending a relationship is difficult enough without having to negotiate furniture, rental contracts, pets and who gets to keep the expensive coffee machine.
Perhaps that’s the part the U-Haul joke tends to leave out.
Do lesbian couples actually move faster?
Despite the stereotype’s popularity, there isn’t enough consistent research to conclude that lesbian couples generally move in together faster than heterosexual or male same-sex couples.
Research into relationship development has explored differences in intimacy, commitment, cohabitation and communication, but these are complex subjects influenced by age, income, culture, housing conditions and individual expectations.
It’s also important to distinguish between moving in together quickly and forming an emotionally intense relationship. The two aren’t necessarily connected.
Some women become emotionally committed very quickly but maintain separate homes for years. Others move in together for financial or logistical reasons while taking a more cautious approach to long-term commitment.
And plenty of lesbian couples date slowly, value independence and have no interest in sharing a wardrobe after a handful of romantic evenings.
The stereotype survives partly because it’s funny and partly because people remember the stories that confirm it. A couple who moves in together after three dates makes a memorable anecdote. Two women who date for eighteen months before discussing cohabitation are considerably less likely to become the subject of a joke.
That doesn’t make the first couple more representative.
Maybe the U-Haul isn’t the problem
There’s something rather appealing about the idea of two people being so certain about each other that they can’t imagine waiting another moment to build a life together.
Romantic films have been celebrating impulsive decisions for generations. Characters abandon jobs, cross continents and declare eternal love after knowing each other for remarkably short periods. Audiences generally applaud, provided the soundtrack is sufficiently convincing.
Yet when two women decide to move in together quickly, the situation often becomes a punchline.
Perhaps part of the stereotype’s longevity comes from that contradiction. Lesbian relationships have historically been denied the same romantic legitimacy as heterosexual ones, while simultaneously being mocked for taking commitment too seriously.
The reality is much less dramatic. Some couples move quickly because they’re in love. Others do it because of distance, convenience or a shared desire for stability. Some regret the decision, while others spend the next thirty years proving that it was the right one.
There isn’t a universal timetable for falling in love, and waiting a prescribed number of months doesn’t guarantee a successful relationship any more than moving quickly guarantees disaster.
The important thing is whether both people understand what they’re committing to, feel comfortable with the pace and have enough freedom to say they’re not ready.
As for the famous second-date U-Haul, perhaps the joke has survived because everyone recognises the temptation to skip the uncertainty and get straight to the happy ending.
Just make sure you’ve discussed whose furniture you’re keeping before booking the truck.
Leave a Reply